Another MIT scientist has come forward to dispute the wildly ominous predictions of modern-day prophet Al Gore and his legions of devoted followers. Writing in Newsweek, Richard S. Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at MIT, concludes that not only is there is no evidence for predictions of planetary doom, implementation of Gore’s remedies will likely cost us dearly.
Lindzen writes, “The current alarm rests on the false assumption not only that we live in a perfect world, temperaturewise, but also that our warming forecasts for the year 2040 are somehow more reliable than the weatherman’s forecast for next week.”
And publisher, lawyer and college history professor Theodore P. Savas puts it this way, “As I have been explaining to my law and history students for the past 16 years, humans have a natural tendency to use their own short life spans as a yardstick for measuring what is “normal.†Therefore, …the natural conclusion of the uninformed and non-thinking among us is that what is happening today is “abnormalâ€Ââ€â€and thus something to fear.”
Will Gore’s sycophants listen to these voices of sanity? Don’t bet on it. As William F Buckley said in a column last week, “The whole business is eerily religious in feel.” And that is exactly what it is, a religion, complete with a canon, priests and prophets and quick to publicly denounce heretics.