Prince Charles is Living on Borrowed Time: His Palace Will One Day be an Islamic Community Center

The Prince of Wales has his well-pressed knickers in a knot over global warming, kicking off his pet project, “Costing The Earth — The Accounting For Sustainability” before an audience of dignitaries at St. James Palace. The Prince warned that we humans are “living on borrowed time,” and “It is our children and grandchildren who will have to pay off this debt and we owe it to them and ourselves to do something about it before it is too late.”

Apparently unaware that Albert Einstein settled the question for once and for all when he declared that we can neither create nor destroy matter or energy, His Highness frets that “We are consuming the resources of our planet at such a rate that we are, in effect, living off credit and living on borrowed time.” Prince Charles has officially joined the ranks of the superstitious pagans who invented the 1.6 gallon toilet, fearing that water would one day disappear off the planet if something drastic was not done.

But putting the eco-scare argument aside, as Mark Steyn points out in his excellent new book, “America Alone: The End Of The World As We Know It,” the Prince is worrying about the wrong thing. The UK is teetering on the brink of Islamization, yet British leaders are choosing not to acknowledge that the problem exists. With a disappearing ancestral population (they’re not having babies) and a Muslim immigrant population growing exponentially, Prince Charles’ grandchildren, if he ever gets any, will be lucky if they can survive the Islamic theocracy.

The problem is much farther advanced in Europe than in America, but signs of what is coming are everywhere. A couple of weeks ago, six Muslim Imams were ejected from a passenger jet in Minneapolis-St Paul for behaving suspiciously. They claimed they were only praying but security officials cited their one-way tickets, the fact they requested seat belt extensions, the fact they sat in different sections of the plane and the fact that they were openly denouncing America – in English – as the reasons for their actions. Would you want to get on that plane?

And this week, in a Detroit suburb, a Muslim woman is screaming that her civil rights have been violated because she was asked not to set out her prayer rug and perform her prayers at a local health club. The manager at the Fitness USA club asked Wardeh Sultan not to pray in the gym because he correctly assumed that all of the paying membership might not like the idea of doing their bench presses in a mosque. As with the airport incident, a Muslim “rights” group immediately came forward to charge the health club with prejudice against Muslims.
Of course, if a couple of evangelical Christians were to hold a Bible study at Fitness USA, they would be bounced out on their ears and no one would care.

One Response to “Prince Charles is Living on Borrowed Time: His Palace Will One Day be an Islamic Community Center”

  1. I am a bit down in the dumps today, because people who say we are now surrendering in Iraq fail to grasp that we went to Iraq to get their oil. Or perhaps Rush and his clones know we went into Iraq for oil and have no conscience just like Bush and Cheney.

    We did this to stabilize the dollar, which will fall if the middle east becomes chaotic. We went into Iraq because Saddam was threatening to change to the euro instead of the dollar. This would result in fewer dollars being needed by nations of the world to have in reserve to purchase oil. It is clear that if you type in the words, Iraq, oil, Bush into google you will see that we have records of this plan by the US government prior to 911.

    How does my view connect to this post above? It means that the US government is not that concerned about terrorism in a vacuum. It is not as important as the need for oil and the stabilization of the dollar. Terrorism, like WMD and Democracy was the excuse of the neocons to invade Iraq and steal their oil. It almost makes me want to barf that our leaders are barbarians, murderers for oil, and possible war criminals, and that we have little moral advantage in Iraq.

    Let George Bush or Dick Cheney come to this website and prove that I am wrong. I believe that the media is afraid even to touch this subject. Remember on the eve of the election Bush saying that we must protect the oil fields in Iraq from terrorists ? What he really meant to say was that we must protect Iraq oil fields for ourselves and from the Iraq people.

    Study people, and you will see that President Bush is the worst president in the history of the United States, and that he has lowered this country’s ethical demands to the point where we are no better than any other aggressor country.

    I am down in the dumps because this nation has been the last to know these things, as foreign governments and peoples have known it for some time.

Leave a Reply