Comments on: Islamic Thinkers Society: The First Amendment is a “Loophole”

By: LARGO_44

LARGO_44 — Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:02:36 +0000

But you have no problems with your Muslim friends trying to kill us, do you, Gary?

By: Gary Anderson

Gary Anderson — Fri, 17 Nov 2006 04:08:38 +0000

Tom, I see there have been glitches with some of my posts. Please delete post number 6. You have emailed me and since then my posts have been better. I appreciated your oppenness to views other than your own.

As far as the flag is concerned, while I have no strong objection to making it illegal to desecrate the flag, I don’t believe the flag is holy. I believe that only spiritual realities are holy, which is a new covenant view. Therefore, if laws preventing using the flag wrongly become “religious” in nature, then they are misused. That is the concern I have with these laws.

By: Gary Anderson

Gary Anderson — Wed, 15 Nov 2006 02:01:33 +0000

Tom why don’t you let my posts post? Forget you. You can’t learn anyway so I will see you after the war crimes trials of Bush and Cheney. You are an idiot Tom.

By: LARGO_44

LARGO_44 — Mon, 13 Nov 2006 04:53:53 +0000

Hmm…Funny how the Democrats like Gary, Dave, and crew won’t say anything about this. Then again, why should one be surprised since they really don’t care about the threat the terrorists pose.

By: LARGO_44

LARGO_44 — Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:07:45 +0000

Why yes…I do believe that is the sound of crickets chirping in the background. Ask a liberal what their plan is other than appeasing the Muslims and they suddenly go silent…go figure.

By: LARGO_44

LARGO_44 — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:46:55 +0000

So what’s your idea, Dave?

Just let the Muslims run rampant until they dictate how this country is run like they did with France?

By: dave

dave — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:00:15 +0000

when you say “close the loophole”, do you mean fundamentally change the consitution? So, to help defeat the terrorists, you want to have us destroy our own way of life that has worked for 200+ years, instead of them doing it? I think its backwards thinking to say that you want to close the loophole. What does that even mean? How precisely would you “close the loophole”? And what would you hope to accomplish by it? Would you arrest these people for saying things? Investigate them, sure. Check their backgrounds, sure. But to change our own constitution would be, in a way, doing the job for the enemy.

By: LARGO_44

LARGO_44 — Tue, 07 Nov 2006 23:02:42 +0000

Yeah…and we can start by getting rid of the people who want to help the Muslims destroy America: Kerry, Hillary, Dean, and about half the democratic party.